Specht v. Google Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HARRY D. LEINENWEBER, District Judge.
Before the Court is Defendant Google Inc.’s (“Google”) Motion for Summary Judgment for Counts I-Y of Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint, and for Counts I and III of its Counterclaim. For the reasons stated below, Google’s Motion is granted.
I. INTRODUCTION
Trying to take part in the Internet boom of the 1990’s, Erich Specht (“Specht”) developed the Android Data Software Suite, an e-commerce platform designed for small business owners. In 1998, he incorporated Android Data Corporation (“ADC”), which through 2002 generated…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Park 'N Fly, Inc. v. Dollar Park & Fly, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Brookfield Communications, Inc. v. West Coast Entertainment CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- United Drug Co. v. Theodore Rectanus Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Hana Financial, Inc. v. Hana BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Hana Financial, Inc. v. Hana BankSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- SAM'S RIVERSIDE, INC. v. Intercon Solutions, Inc.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 2011
- Marketquest Grp., Inc. v. BIC Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 2018
- Dalkita, Inc. v. Distilling Craft, LLCDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2018
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.