Northland Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. Blinco
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGehl, J.
We are required to determine whether the so-called judgment is appealable. If it is not, we are without jurisdiction to consider the merits of the controversy. Wilt v. Neenah Cold Storage Co. (1907), 130 Wis. 398, 110 N. W. 177; Kling v. Sommers (1948), 252 Wis. 217, 31 N. W. (2d) 206. The fact that the question has not been raijed is immaterial, for such failure does not confer jurisdiction. Richter v. Standard Mfg. Co. (1937), 224 Wis. 121, 271 N. W. 14, 271 N. W. 914. The fact that the document signed by the judge is designated as an interlocutory judgment is not controlling. Lemon v.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Richter v. Standard Manufacturing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
- In Re Fidelity Assurance Ass'nWisconsin Supreme Court · 1945
- Kling v. SommersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1948
- Kickapoo Development Corp. v. Kickapoo Orchard Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
- Stanley v. BradfordWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Opelt v. CrispWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Thomas/Van Dyken Joint Venture v. Van DykenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- Glens Falls Insurance Co. of New York v. Concrete Research, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- Aspenleiter v. William Beaudoin & Sons, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
- Roeske v. DiefenbachWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.