Legal Opinion

Roeske v. Diefenbach

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 17, 1975No. 698, 699PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkie, C. J.

The plaintiffs-respondents have moved to dismiss all the appeals in this case. Two notices of appeal were served and filed on behalf of defendant-appellant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, and one notice of appeal was served and filed on behalf of defendant-appellant Aetna Insurance Company. Two actions were commenced to recover damages for personal injuries suffered by the plaintiffs as the result of an automobile accident. The actions were consolidated for purposes of trial. Both State Farm and Aetna raised affirmative defenses of no coverage. The coverage issues were tried…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Schueler v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Northland Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. BlincoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Buckley v. Park Building Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Cooper v. Commercial Casualty Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Glens Falls Insurance Co. of New York v. Concrete Research, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1973

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Kovach v. SchubertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Silverton Enterprises, Inc. v. General Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API