Alaska Plastics, Inc. v. Coppock
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CONNOR, Justice.
The issue in this case involves the rights of a minority shareholder in a close corporation who allegedly has been deprived of benefits accorded other shareholders. The trial judge concluded that the corporation was obligated to buy the minority shareholder’s stock at its fair value. We have concluded that this remedy is not available on the present record as a matter of law. Accordingly, we remand to the superior court to determine whether, based upon adequate findings of fact and conclusions of law, a remedy more appropriate to the alleged facts is available.
Those…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Donahue v. Rodd Electrotype Co. of New England, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Jones v. H. F. Ahmanson & Co.California Supreme Court · 1969
- Ransom v. HanerAlaska Supreme Court · 1961
- Louis Greenspon v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, (Three Cases). Anna Greenspon v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1956
- Baker v. Commercial Body Builders, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1973
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Crosby v. BeamOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- Landstrom v. ShaverSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Interlake Porsche + Audi, Inc. v. BucholzCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986
- Davis v. Sheerin, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1988
- Thompson v. Central Ohio Cellular, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1994
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.