Legal Opinion

Vena v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 1997No. 95-304PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The primary focus in this appeal, taken by Joseph J. Vena (Vena) from his convictions of conspiracy to commit first degree murder, in violation of Wyo. Stat. § 6-1-303 (1988), and first degree murder, in violation of Wyo. Stat. § 6-2-101 (Supp.1994), is upon the vol-untariness of statements given to law enforcement officers in which Vena admitted his involvement in the charged crimes. Vena asserts that the trial court erred in its pretrial ruling that the statements were voluntary, and also in improperly instructing the jury on the issue of voluntariness of the statements.…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Moran v. BurbineSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Thompson v. KeohaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Vaughn v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Brown v. UphoffCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
  3. Brown v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Hannon v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Simmers v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1997

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API