Legal Opinion

In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Johnson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 19, 1992No. 8824PublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAndersen, J.

Facts of Case

This disciplinary matter comes to the court on the appeal of attorney Ivan D. Johnson who was admitted to practice law in the State of Washington in 1979. It concerns the proper sanction to be imposed where an attorney has engaged in business transactions with clients without making adequate written disclosures.

In 1980, Richard Hackler, then age 22, became permanently disabled as a result of an automobile accident and his parents became his full-time caregivers. In 1983, Richard received a settlement of the claim arising out of the accident.

Richard's father, Archie Hackler, was…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Matter of Disciplinary Proceeding Against CurranWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  2. In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against McGlothlenWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  3. In Re NobleWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  4. In Re E. Gene Wade Joyzelle I. Wade, Debtors. E. Gene Wade Joyzelle I. Wade v. State Bar of ArizonaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  5. In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. In Re HalversonWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  2. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding against DannWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Matter of DannWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against CarmickWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  5. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding against HalversonWashington Supreme Court · 2000

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API