In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Carmick
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.
— Attorney Stephen T. Carmick asks us to reverse the recommendation of the Washington State Bar Association Disciplinary Board (Disciplinary Board) to suspend him for 60 days from the practice of law for violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct (RPCs). The violations arose from Carmick’s representation of a client in settlement negotiations concerning outstanding interest on a child support judgment. The Disciplinary Board found Carmick violated the RPCs by (1) misrepresenting an ex parte order to the superior court; (2) negotiating directly with an adverse party he knew, or should…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Disciplinary Proceeding v. NobleWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- Matter of Disciplinary Proceeding Against CurranWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against McGlothlenWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- Wright v. Group Health HospitalWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- In Re HalversonWashington Supreme Court · 2000
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against KuvaraWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- Matter of Disciplinary Proceeding Against KuvaraWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against WhittWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- In Re Disciplinary Proceeding Against PooleWashington Supreme Court · 2006
- In Re Disciplinary Proceeding Against WhittWashington Supreme Court · 2003
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.