Legal Opinion
In re Kurtz
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 4, 1992PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Respondent, Irving Kurtz, was admitted to the practice of *208law in New York by the First Judicial Department on February 10, 1975. At all times relevant herein, respondent has maintained an office for the practice of law within the First Judicial Department.
On or about February 7, 1991, respondent was served with a notice and statement of charges. The charges contained eight counts of serious professional misconduct involving respondent’s alleged deliberate conversion of clients’ funds held in his escrow account. The charges state that, in each instance, respondent deposited…
3Cases cited9 opinions
- In re MarksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- In re MalatestaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- In re SchmidtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- In re PressmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- In re WalkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by5 opinions
- In re CatalfoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- In re SteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- In re PittsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- In re ErdheimAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- In re WeinerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997