Legal Opinion

In re Malatesta

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 5, 1987PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Respondent Theodore L. Malatesta was admitted to practice as an attorney and counselor-at-law by this court on June 20, 1960. At all times relevant, he has maintained an office for the practice of law in this judicial department.

Petitioner Departmental Disciplinary Committee moves for an order confirming the findings of fact and conclusions of law of a Hearing Panel, which also recommended disbarment.

On April 19, 1982, respondent, who had been retained to represent Gloria Sparber in the sale of a cooperative apartment, agreed in writing to hold in escrow a check for…

3Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In re MarksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  2. In re PressmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  3. In re WalkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  4. In re LevineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  5. In re PinelloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by28 opinions

  1. In re SchmidtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  2. In re AltschulerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  3. In re AmpelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  4. In re LubellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  5. In re EngramAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API