Legal Opinion

Paul A.. Pigott v. Detroit, Toledo & Ironton Railroad Company

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 4, 1955No. 12143PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

221 F.2d 736

Paul A. PIGOTT, Eugene E. Murphy, William F. Menard, Frank

R. McNabb, Vincent W. Baumia, Ernest E. Lamb, Harold

Hatcher, Jr., Thomas R. Hall, Paul Evans, henry J. Barrown,

and Milton E. Stone, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

DETROIT, TOLEDO & IRONTON RAILROAD COMPANY, a Corporation,

and Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 12143.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

March 4, 1955.

William A. Rhodes, Detroit, Mich. (Edward J. Fruchtman, Richard F. Watt, Cotton, Fruchtman & Watt, Chicago, Ill., on the brief), for appellants.

Theodore Sachs, Detroit, Mich. (Rothe,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Shelley v. KraemerSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Duignan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  4. National Labor Relations Board v. Highland Park Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  5. United Railroad Operating Crafts v. Pennsylvania R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1954

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. International Ass'n of MacHinists v. StreetSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Pennsylvania Railroad v. RychlikSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Langston v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
  4. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1958
  5. Ellered v. Southern Pacific Railroad Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1957

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API