Legal Opinion

Cregier v. Coe

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided November 6, 1933No. 5796PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justice.

This appeal is from a decree of the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia, dismissing appellant’s petition, filed under section 4915, R. S. (U. S. C., title 35, § 63 [35 USCA § 63]), to require the Commissioner of Patents to issue him a patent upon an abandoned application.

Two applications were involved in this case in the Patent Office, one filed February 18, 1907, the other filed September 13, 1920'. In neither instance was the ease prosecuted to a completion in the Patent Office, and no attempt was made to invoke the jurisdiction of the court, on the…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Commissariat a L'EnErgiE Atomique v. Robert C. Watson, Commissioner of PatentsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1960
  2. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Norton CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1965
  3. Pangborn Corp. v. American Foundry Equipment Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1946
  4. Charles K. Cregier v. Conway P. Coe, Commissioner of Patents.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  5. Hastings v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API