Legal Opinion

State v. Grams

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 1942PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

A sale of liquor by a licensed bartender during the proprietor’s absence does not relieve the proprietor of responsibility or take him out from under the condemnation of sec. 176.06, Stats., which forbids the keeping open between 1 a. m. and 8 a. m. for the sale of liquor premises for which a retail “Class B” liquor license has been issued. Intent is not the controlling element. It seems that if the licensee (proprietor) is not excused when personally conducting the business, if he be deceived about or is ignorant of violations regarding forbidden traffic, he cannot escape the consequences of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Carroll v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1885
  2. State ex rel. Conlin v. Mayor of WausauWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Olson v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Reismier v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Weinberg v. KlucheskyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. WachsmuthWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  2. State v. Dried Milk Products Co-OperativeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  3. City of Milwaukee v. PiscuineWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Pueblo v. MirandaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1956
  5. State v. MaasWisconsin Supreme Court · 1944

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API