Olson v. State
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Ebeoe to review a judgment of the circuit court for Elorence county: Johst Goodlawd, Circuit Judge. The plaintiff in error (hereinafter called defendant) was-convicted under sec. 1564, Stats. (1898), of selling and giving away intoxicating liquors on Sunday. The facts will sufficiently appear from the opinion. ■ ■
1Opinion of the CourtVibtje, J.
1. The first error assigned is that the evidence does not sustain the verdict. There is a direct conflict in the testimony as to what was drank in the saloon on the night in question. The witness Sherwin, on behalf of the state, testified it was beer; that he saw the men drink, and examined the glasses on the bar after the drinking had taken place, and,, from such examination, he knew it was beer. Two witnesses-for defendant, who are claimed by the- state to have drank beer, testified that it was ginger ale and not beer that they *414drank. The third witness does not recollect that be drank…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State ex rel. Conlin v. Mayor of WausauWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
- Schuster v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1891
- Van Haltren v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1914
- Reismier v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
- State v. GramsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1942
- Sheehan v. LewisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
- Doscher v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.