Weinberg v. Kluchesky
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFritz, J.
The plaintiff seeks an injunction permanently enjoining the chief of police of Milwaukee from prosecuting him for keeping a retail liquor store, which he operates under a “Retail Class A” license issued under sec. 176.05 (2), Stats., open between 9 o’clock p. m. and 1 o’clock a. m., in violation of sec. 176.06 (2), Stats. The statutory provisions involved, so far as here material, read as follows:
Sec. 176.05 (2) .(a) : “Licenses to sell, deal, or traffic in intoxicating liquors shall be designated either ‘Retail Class A’ or ‘Retail Class B.’ A retail license ‘Class A’ shall permit its holder…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bartemeyer v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Giozza v. TiernanSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- State ex rel. Kellogg v. CurrensWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
- Mehlos v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
- Zodrow v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. WachsmuthWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. CoubalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1945
- City of Milwaukee v. PiscuineWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Ex Parte StrauchCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1945
- State Ex Rel. Martin v. BarrettWisconsin Supreme Court · 1946
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.