Legal Opinion

Weinberg v. Kluchesky

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1940PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFritz, J.

The plaintiff seeks an injunction permanently enjoining the chief of police of Milwaukee from prosecuting him for keeping a retail liquor store, which he operates under a “Retail Class A” license issued under sec. 176.05 (2), Stats., open between 9 o’clock p. m. and 1 o’clock a. m., in violation of sec. 176.06 (2), Stats. The statutory provisions involved, so far as here material, read as follows:

Sec. 176.05 (2) .(a) : “Licenses to sell, deal, or traffic in intoxicating liquors shall be designated either ‘Retail Class A’ or ‘Retail Class B.’ A retail license ‘Class A’ shall permit its holder…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bartemeyer v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Giozza v. TiernanSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. State ex rel. Kellogg v. CurrensWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Mehlos v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Zodrow v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. WachsmuthWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  2. State v. CoubalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1945
  3. City of Milwaukee v. PiscuineWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Ex Parte StrauchCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1945
  5. State Ex Rel. Martin v. BarrettWisconsin Supreme Court · 1946

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API