Legal Opinion

Houlihan v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 28, 1979No. 58386PublishedCited by 101 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CLINTON, Judge.

What is denominated an appeal comes to us after the court below heard a motion to reduce sentence filed by petitioner and declined to grant relief. The motion invoked the “shock probation” provisions of Article 42.12, Section 3e, V.A.C.C.P. The ruling of the court was verbally amplified as follows:

“THE COURT: I think it’s a jurisdictional question. The fact that he had probation and a motion to revoke his probation was filed, and he appealed it through the court of this state removes it from this Court’s jurisdiction as to whether or not he can get probation again.…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Basaldua v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
  2. Womack v. BerryTexas Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Ex Parte GilesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
  4. State Ex Rel. Vance v. ClawsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
  5. United States v. Ersel StollingsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1975

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by101 opinions

  1. Dickens v. Court of Appeals for the Second Supreme Judicial District of TexasCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
  2. Dodson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1999
  3. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
  4. Ex Parte LangleyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  5. State v. RobinsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2016

96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API