Morsinkhoff v. De Luxe Laundry & Dry Cleaning Co.
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
MAUGHMER, Commissioner.
Plaintiff had a verdict and judgment for $1,280.12. His claim arises from the breach, of an alleged contract for personal employment, which he asserts is actionable-under the doctrine of promissory estoppel. Defendants contend that plaintiff’s evidence-failed to make a submissible case and that their motions for directed verdict submitted at the close of all the evidence (and for similar after-trial motions) should have been sustained. The refusal of the trial court to do so is the sole basis of this appeal.
It is true, as plaintiff asserts, that on. appeal of a jury…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Seymour v. OelrichsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Christy v. PetrusSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
- Feinberg v. Pfeiffer CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1959
- Siegel v. EllisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
- Kahn v. Cecelia Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1941
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Olympic Holding Co., L.L.C. v. ACE Ltd.Ohio Supreme Court · 2009
- Faust v. Ryder Commercial Leasing & ServicesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
- Deborah Denise Skinner v. Maritz, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
- Bethea v. Levi Strauss & Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- Heinritz v. Lawrence UniversityCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1995
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.