Legal Opinion

Moses v. Meier

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 11, 1934PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBelt, J.

This is an original mandamus proceeding — friendly in nature — to compel the defendant officials jointly to execute and issue certificates of indebtedness of the par value of $250,000, to meet the demands for unemployment relief as provided by section 2, chapter 93, Oregon Laws, Second Special Session, 1933. The demurrer to the alternative writ presents the question as to whether the issuance and sale of such certificates of indebtedness as authorized by the above act would be in violation of Article XI, section 7, of the Constitution of this state which, so far as material herein, provides:

“T…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Alabama State Bridge Corporation v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  2. Briggs v. Greenville CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
  3. Ajax v. GregoryWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Klein v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  5. McClain v. Regents of the UniversityOregon Supreme Court · 1928

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Gruen v. State Tax CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  2. New Jersey Sports & Exposition Authority v. McCraneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1972
  3. Boswell v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  4. State Highway Commissioner v. Detroit City ControllerMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
  5. DeFazio v. Washington Public Power Supply SystemOregon Supreme Court · 1984

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API