Stitt v. Eastern R. Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts
At Law.
1Opinion of the CourtColt, J.
This is an action at law to recover damages for alleged infringement of letters patent No. 147,863, granted to George Richards, February 24, 1874, for “improvement in perches for dumping cars.” The only question before the court is whether the patent is void for want of novelty under the following circumstances contained in the agreed statement of facts:
“That in the year 1868 one William Parker, then a resident of Aspinwall, in the republic of Columbia, and superintendent of the Panama Railroad Company, sent from Aspinwall to the Portland Company, a corporation doing business as manufacturers…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Coffin v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Parker v. FergusonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1849
3Cited by12 opinions
- Picard v. United Aircraft CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- Block v. Nathan Anklet Support Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
- Buser v. Novelty Tufting Machine Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1907
- Chicopee Manufacturing Corp. v. Columbus Fiber Mills Co.District Court, M.D. Georgia · 1958
- In re SchlittlerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.