Buser v. Novelty Tufting Machine Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
I Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern ■District of Ohio.
1Opinion of the Court
COCHRAN, District Judge.
This appeal is from an interlocutory decree granting an injunction, with a reference for an accounting, in a suit for the infringement of certain patents, brought July 12, 1902. The appellee, also hereafter referred to at times as “plaintiff,” owns said patents by assignment. They all relate to tufting machines; i. e., machines for making tufted work in upholstering in the furniture, carriage, and casket trades. They are six in number, to wit: No. 511,649, to H. B. Pitner, December 26, 1893; No. 577,809, to H. B. Pitner, February 23, 1897; No. 592,508, to A. Freschl,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- The Barbed Wire PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Gayler v. WilderSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
- Coffin v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Columbus Chain Co. v. Standard Chain Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1906
- American Roll-Paper Co. v. WestonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1893
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Esme E. Rosaire v. Baroid Sales Division, National Lead CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
- Block v. Nathan Anklet Support Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
- Midland Flour Milling Co. v. BobbittCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
- National Mach. Corp. v. Benthall Mach. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1916
- Connecticut Valley Enterprises, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.