Legal Opinion
Zemelman v. Boston Insurance
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 30, 1970No. Civ. 33343PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
REPPY, J.
Appelants who are copartners, brought this action against six insurance companies to recover the proceeds of policies of fire insurance and interest thereon claimed to be due after a fire damaged the partnership premises which were the subject of the policies. In their answers the insurance companies claimed that such policies were voided when one of the copartners, Irving Zemelman, made false statements on behalf of the partnership in its claim for the proceeds. Five of the insurance companies, who are the respondents herein, were granted summary judgments after both sides…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Teitelbaum Furs, Inc. v. Dominion Ins. Co., Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1962
- Khadouri Chaachou v. American Central Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
- Blackmon v. HaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Grant v. WeatherholtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Nuffer v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Stout v. TurneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Braemoor AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- American States Insurance Company v. Alexis BorborCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Bennie Vitale, and Anna Vitale v. The Aetna Casualty & Surety CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- Baxter v. Flick (In Re Flick)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California · 1987
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.