Legal Opinion

Blackmon v. Hale

California Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1970No. L.A. 29674PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

TRAYNOR, C. J.

Plaintiff Blackmon appeals from a judgment in favor of defendants Hale, Lee, United California Bank, and Bank of America entered in an action to recover $23,500 plus interest. He sought to recover this sum from defendants on the ground that each of them was liable for the failure of defendant Adams to repay plaintiff $23,500 that plaintiff entrusted to Adams. A default judgment against Adams is not involved in this appeal.

In July 1961 James C. Adams, an attorney, undertook to represent plaintiff in the latter’s proposed purchase of a note and mortgage on real property in…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. State Bar of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Purdy v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Kamen & Co. v. Paul H. Aschkar & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
  4. Fox v. TayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Keeney v. Bank of ItalyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Perdue v. Crocker National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Zimmerman v. Hogg & Allen, Professional Ass'nSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  3. Bullis v. Security Pacific National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Cook v. Brundidge, Fountain, Elliott & ChurchillTexas Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Crouse v. Brobeck, Phleger & HarrisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API