Blackmon v. Hale
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TRAYNOR, C. J.
Plaintiff Blackmon appeals from a judgment in favor of defendants Hale, Lee, United California Bank, and Bank of America entered in an action to recover $23,500 plus interest. He sought to recover this sum from defendants on the ground that each of them was liable for the failure of defendant Adams to repay plaintiff $23,500 that plaintiff entrusted to Adams. A default judgment against Adams is not involved in this appeal.
In July 1961 James C. Adams, an attorney, undertook to represent plaintiff in the latter’s proposed purchase of a note and mortgage on real property in…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- State Bar of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Purdy v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Kamen & Co. v. Paul H. Aschkar & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
- Fox v. TayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Keeney v. Bank of ItalyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Perdue v. Crocker National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Zimmerman v. Hogg & Allen, Professional Ass'nSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- Bullis v. Security Pacific National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Cook v. Brundidge, Fountain, Elliott & ChurchillTexas Supreme Court · 1976
- Crouse v. Brobeck, Phleger & HarrisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.