Legal Opinion
Marshall v. Ravisies
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided June 15, 1886PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hernando county. The facts of the case are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Raney
The affidavit in attachment in this case is according to the recital in its body made by “ Edmond Ravisies, (agent of Isabella Ravisies) ” and is signed “ Edmond Ravisies, agent for Isabella Ravisies,” and states, among other things, that Robert J. Marshall is indebted to the said Isabella Ravisies, giving the amount of the indebtedness. *584The attachment bond is according to the recital in the body of the bond made by “ Edmond Ravisies (agent of Isabella Ravisies) and Edmond Ravisies and C. C. Keathly.” The condition of the bond is that “ whereas the said Edmond Ravisies (agent of Isabella…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- King v. GwynnSupreme Court of Florida · 1871
- Harrison v. ThurstonSupreme Court of Florida · 1867
- Tanner & Delaney Engine Co. v. Hall & MobleySupreme Court of Florida · 1886
- Conklin v. GoldsmithSupreme Court of Florida · 1853
- E. Simpson & Co. v. Knight & FrasierSupreme Court of Florida · 1867
3Cited by4 opinions
- Caldwell v. Peoples BankSupreme Court of Florida · 1917
- Busard v. Houston ex rel. HoustonSupreme Court of Florida · 1913
- Cornwell v. WillifordSupreme Court of Florida · 1917
- Warren v. F. C. Daffin Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1921