Legal Opinion
The E. S. Atwood
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided April 9, 1923No. 201PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHough, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). We pass to consideration of the navigation of the Atwood, without deeming it necessary to comment on certain claims made by appellant United States concerning the alleged undermanning of the Atwood and the personal habits of her master. There is nothing in these suggestions. *739The outstanding fact about this collision is that it occurred on a night when no difficulty of navigation is suggested, between a tow in charge of a full-powered tug and a vessel at anchor. The very fact that such a collision occurred puts a very serious burden of explanation upon the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Luckenbach v. W. J. McCahan Sugar Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Richardson v. HarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Pendleton v. Benner LineSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Gulf of MexicoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
- The SoerstadDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1919
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- The No. 34.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
- Leach v. Hedger Transp. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
- Duncanson-Harrelson Co. v. DavidsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933
- The Linseed KingDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1930
- The WaterfordCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.