Legal Opinion

The Linseed King

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 17, 1930PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PATTERSON, District Judge.

This is a limitation of liability proceeding under section 4283 of the Revised Statutes (46 USCA §183). It comes before me on exceptions to a commissioner’s report.

On December 20, 1926, the Linseed King sank in the Hudson River. Many lives were lost. The survivors managed in one way or another not to be drowned, but suffered from exposure. The Linseed King was a launch owned and operated by Spencer Kellogg & Sons, Inc., which had a manufacturing plant at Edgewater, N. J. Many of the men employed there came from New York City. The launch was used to carry them from a…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Southern Pacific Company v. JensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Leisy v. HardinSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Grant Smith-Porter Ship Co. v. RohdeSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. New York Central Railroad Company v. WinfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  5. Luckenbach v. W. J. McCahan Sugar Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. Howard Ross and Paul GordonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
  2. Briscoe v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
  3. Circle Line Sightseeing Yachts, Inc. v. Mary E. Storbeck, Claimant-Appellant, and the City of New York, Claimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
  4. Estate of Muer v. KarbelCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  5. In Re Charles A. MuerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API