Legal Opinion

Duncanson-Harrelson Co. v. Davidson

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 27, 1933No. 6759PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NORCROSS, District Judge.

This is an appeal of libelant and cross-appeals of respondents presenting questions of negligence of the respective parties resulting in a collision on the Bay of San Francisco, and in the event both were so negligent, the rule applicable in the apportionment of damages.

Libelant, appellant and cross-appellee, on and prior to the 8th day of July, 1930; owned and operated on the Bay of San Francisco a barge used for submarine drilling, known as Drill Barge No. 3, which barge on the date mentioned was anchored in San Pablo Strait between the Marin Islands and a group of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. The E. S. AtwoodCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
  2. United States v. King Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925
  3. The PerseveranceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Intagliata v. Shipowners & Merchants Towboat Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Pacific Tow Boat Co. v. States Marine Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
  3. Pacific Tow Boat Company v. States Marine Corporation Of DelawareCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
  4. Victorias Milling Co., Inc., as Owners of the M/v Nonsuco v. Panama Canal CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
  5. Pacific Spruce Corp. v. City & County of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API