Duncanson-Harrelson Co. v. Davidson
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
NORCROSS, District Judge.
This is an appeal of libelant and cross-appeals of respondents presenting questions of negligence of the respective parties resulting in a collision on the Bay of San Francisco, and in the event both were so negligent, the rule applicable in the apportionment of damages.
Libelant, appellant and cross-appellee, on and prior to the 8th day of July, 1930; owned and operated on the Bay of San Francisco a barge used for submarine drilling, known as Drill Barge No. 3, which barge on the date mentioned was anchored in San Pablo Strait between the Marin Islands and a group of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- The E. S. AtwoodCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
- United States v. King Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925
- The PerseveranceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
3Cited by11 opinions
- Intagliata v. Shipowners & Merchants Towboat Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
- Pacific Tow Boat Co. v. States Marine Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
- Pacific Tow Boat Company v. States Marine Corporation Of DelawareCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
- Victorias Milling Co., Inc., as Owners of the M/v Nonsuco v. Panama Canal CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
- Pacific Spruce Corp. v. City & County of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.