Legal Opinion

Hughey v. Ausborn

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 26, 1967No. 18656PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Moss, Chief Justice.

Norman V. Hughey, Jr., the respondent herein, instituted this action against Melvin H. Ausborn, the appellant herein, to recover actual and punitive damages for medical expenses incurred by him as the father of Mary Carole Hughey, and as the husband of Edith L. Hughey, and for the loss of consortium of his wife, resulting from an automobile accident that occurred in the City of Greenville, South Carolina, on March 10, 1965, by reason of the negligent, reckless and willful acts of the appellant. The answer of the appellant was a general denial.

Mary Carole Hughey, the minor…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cook v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1941
  2. Brown v. FingerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1962
  3. Tucker v. Buffalo Cotton MillsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
  4. Bube v. Birmingham Railway, Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1903
  5. Sossamon v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1964

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Hammond v. North American Asbestos Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Hale v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
  3. People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Garay v. OverholtzerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  5. Watts v. Golden Age Nursing HomeArizona Supreme Court · 1980

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API