Legal Opinion

Daybill v. Lucas

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided October 26, 1936PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The fifteen trustees of the Fidelity Liquidating Trust pray specific performance of a contract whereby defendant, Lucas, agreed to buy from them land on Park avenue in Ridgewood. He refused to accept the tendered deed on the ground that it did not convey marketable title, inasmuch as it was executed by only two of the fifteen trustees in whom the joint title was vested.

The Fidelity Liquidating Trust grew out of the Fidelity Title and Mortgage Guaranty Company of Ridgewood. The court of chancery took charge of the affairs of that company and eventually directed a sale of its assets to the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Morris & Essex Railroad v. Mayor of Jersey CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1899
  2. Rutherford Land & Improvement Co. v. SanntrockSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1900
  3. Kipp v. Fidelity Title and Mortgage, C., Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1934
  4. Tyrrell v. O'ConnorSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1897
  5. Kipp v. Fidelity Title & Mortgage Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Foulke's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  2. Donaldson v. Madison BoroughNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
  3. Childs v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1941
  4. Childs v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API