Legal Opinion
Kipp v. Fidelity Title and Mortgage, C., Co.
New Jersey Court of Chancery
Decided August 4, 1934PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
By direction of the court, some parts of the opinion dealing with evidence, c., are omitted. Omissions are indicated by asterisks.
None of the offers will be accepted, but if, at any time while the estate is still within the control of the court, a really substantial bid is made, it will be considered. Now, to the plan of liquidation.
The plan before me has been presented by a committee representing creditors, both secured and unsecurd. It provides in general for administration and liquidation of all assets by a board of trustees — similar to a Massachusetts business trust. The original…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Block v. HirshSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Camfield v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Marcus Brown Holding Co. v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Edgar A. Levy Leasing Co. v. SiegelSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re Mechanics Trust Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1935
- Daybill v. LucasNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1936
- In Re North Jersey Title Insurance Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1936
- American Lead Pencil v. N.J. TitleNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1941
- Hackensack Trust Co. v. KellyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1935
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.