Rutherford Land & Improvement Co. v. Sanntrock
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On appeal from a decree advised by Vice-Chancellor Pitney, whose opinion is reported in A4 Atl. Rep. 988.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Collins, J.
In affirming this decree we must disclaim concurrence in the opinion of the learned vice-chancellor that if the mortgage to the Mutual Life Insurance Company, on which respondent’s title rests, had been given directly by Mrs. Mohn, the surviving executrix and trustee of Arnold Mohn, instead of by her grantee, the infirmity of whose title was unknown to the company, it would have been perfectly good. This dictum of an experienced judge should not be passed sub sileniio. It is based upon the idea that a general power to “dispose of” lands…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Lancaster v. DolanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1829
- Gordon v. PrestonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1833
3Cited by9 opinions
- Beakey v. KnutsonOregon Supreme Court · 1918
- Javna v. DJ Fredricks, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
- Lueft v. LueftWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
- Daybill v. LucasNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1936
- Stay v. StaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.