Legal Opinion

Gutman v. Worldwide Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 3, 1993PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DEL SOLE, Judge:

This is an appeal from a trial court order declaring that Appellant, Agency Rent-A-Car, is primarily liable to pay Appellees, Roman and Janet Gutman’s, uninsured motorist benefits, up to the statutory limit, and that Appellee, Worldwide Insurance, is liable for any excess up to its policy limits.

The parties stipulated the relevant facts to the trial court. They agreed that the Gutmans were occupying a car they had rented from Appellant (Agency), a self-insured party in accord with the Pennsylvania Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law, 75 Pa.C.S.A. § 1701 et seq., when…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Walker v. FennellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Nationwide Insurance v. CalhounSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. Saunders v. JenkinsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Estate, Ralston v. Metro. Prop. Cas.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. Ingalls v. Hertz Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. In re Petition to Release Adoption Records Pursuant to 23 Pa.C.S. 2905Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API