Legal Opinion

Mattson v. Fezler

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 25, 1949No. 33316PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLuttrell, J.

In this action Day Fezler, and other residents of Winans Second Addition to Oklahoma City, sought to enjoin the defendants Mrs. M. M. Mattson and Dr. P. A. Harris from using their residence property in said addition for business purposes, claiming that such use was in violation of the plat restrictions upon said addition. The trial court permanently enjoined the defendants from making use of their property in said addition for any other purpose except residential purposes only. Defendants appeal.

From the record it appears that Win-ans Second Addition is a small addition composed of six city…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Southwest Petroleum Co. v. LoganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  2. Carr v. RileyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  3. Briggs v. HendricksCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946
  4. Test Oil Co. v. LaTouretteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
  5. Cooke v. KinkeadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Reed v. WilliamsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Continental Oil Co. v. H. E. RappSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
  3. West Nichols Hills Presbyterian Church v. FolksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
  4. Trotter v. LoumSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
  5. Sanditen Investments, Ltd. v. TomlinsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API