Legal Opinion
Venice Coal. to Pres. Unique Cmty. Character v. City of L. A.
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided January 9, 2019No. B285295PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStratton, J.
*46INTRODUCTION
Appellants Venice Coalition to Preserve Unique Community Character and Celia R. Williams alleged in a complaint filed in Los Angeles County Superior Court that the City of Los Angeles engaged in a pattern and practice of illegally exempting certain development projects in Venice from permitting requirements in the Venice Land Use Plan and in the California Coastal Act. The trial court granted summary judgment as to all causes of action, and Venice Coalition, et al., appeal. As we find that the City is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, we affirm.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Miller v. Department of CorrectionsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- Lyle v. Warner Brothers Television ProductionsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- Pacific Palisades Bowl Mobile Estates, LLC v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
- Rodriguez v. SolisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- De La Cruz v. Dept. of Transportation CA2/3California Court of Appeal · 2021
- Dog & Rooster v. Green CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2021
- Lindstrom v. Cal. Coastal CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
- Mosley v. Pacific Specialty Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 2020
- Mosley v. Pacific Specialty Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 2020