Legal Opinion

Dog & Rooster v. Green CA4/1

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 17, 2021No. D077102Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 3/17/21 Dog & Rooster v. Green CA4/1 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DOG & ROOSTER, INC., D077102 Plaintiff and Respondent, v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2019- 00031852-CU-DF-CTL) TODD GREEN, Defendant and Appellant.…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Oasis West Realty v. GoldmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Flatley v. MauroCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Soukup v. Law Offices of Herbert HafifCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API