Legal Opinion

Ahlberg v. German Insurance

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1892PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Wayne. (Gartner, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

This is an action upon an insurance policy. The cause was tried before a jury, and a verdict rendered under the direction of the court for the sum of $518.75 in favor of the plaintiffs.

It appears that the plaintiffs were doing a manufacturing business in the city of Detroit. They owned the building in which the business was carried on, but did not own the ground upon which it was situated, it being leased from the Michigan Central Bailroad Company. On or about February 17, 1891, they applied to Parkinson & Bonninghausen, insurance agents -in Detroit, with whom they had previously done…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hoose v. Prescott InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Pollock v. German Fire-InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Maryland Casualty Co. v. McTyierTennessee Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Plumb v. Penn Mutual Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Raymond v. Farmers' Mutual Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Quackenbush v. Citizens' Insurance Co. of MissouriMichigan Supreme Court · 1907

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API