Legal Opinion

Raymond v. Farmers' Mutual Fire Insurance

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 23, 1897PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error to Mecosta; Palmer, J. Assumpsit by David L. Raymond against the Farmers’ Mutual Fire Insurance Company of Mecosta county upon a policy of insurance. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

The plaintiff is a resident of Pennsylvania, and the owner of a farm in Mecosta county, Mich., which he purchased of Dr. "Whitney, who thereafter acted as his agent in relation to the property. At the time of his purchase, the buildings upon the farm were insured in the defendant company, a mutual fire insurance company, organized and doing business under the laws of this State; and, although we do not readily discover the statement in the record, it seemed to be admitted upon the hearing, as it is asserted in plaintiff’s brief, that he (the plaintiff) succeeded to the ownership of this…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Van Poucke v. Netherland St. Vincent De Paul SocietyMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Canfield v. Great Camp of the Knights of the MaccabeesMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Beebe v. Ohio Farmers' InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Fillmore v. Great Camp of the Knights of the MaccabeesMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Miotke v. Milwaukee Mechanics' InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1897

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Ryan v. New York Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Howe v. Patrons' Mutual Fire Ins.Michigan Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Rose v. Supreme Court, Order of PatriciansMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Schoeneman v. Hartford Fire InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Hogadone v. Grange Mutual Fire-InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1903

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API