Legal Opinion

Kropp v. Parker

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided September 29, 1934No. 2224PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHESNUT, District Judge.

In this case the plaintiff has filed his suit under section 21 of the Act of Congress known as the Longshoremen’s -and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act (March 4, 1927, c. 509, 44 Stat. 1424,1436, 33 USC, § 921 [33 USCA § 921]) to set aside a compensation order of the Deputy Commissioner holding that the plaintiff employe was not entitled to compensation for injury sustained in the course of his employment because he had not filed his claim therefor within one year after his injury as required by section 13 of the act (33 USC, § 913 [33 USCA § 913]) which provides as…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Marsh v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Guderian v. Sterling Sugar & Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
  4. Cooke v. Holland Furnace Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Wheeler v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1931

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Kobilkin v. PillsburyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
  2. Stancil v. MasseyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
  3. Griffin v. Rustless Iron & Steel Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1947
  4. Di Giorgio Fruit Corp. v. NortonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1937
  5. Bethlehem Steel Co. v. ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1947

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API