Legal Opinion
Finnegan v. Butler
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 15, 1920PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Motion for an injunction pendente lite.
1Opinion of the CourtSears, J.
The plaintiff has moved for an injunction pendente lite. He is the proprietor of a daily evening newspaper known as the Buffalo Commercial, and the defendants are the proprietors and managers of all the other daily newspapers in the city of Buffalo published in the English language. The plaintiff’s action is for injunctive relief, and is based upon the theory that the defendants, together with others, have conspired together to injure the business of the plaintiff as publisher of the Buffalo Commercial.
The acts sought to be enjoined may be summarized as follows:(1) Refusing to sell the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- People v. . FlackNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Curran v. . GalenNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
- Auburn Draying Co. v. . WardellNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Straus v. . American Publishers' Assn.New York Court of Appeals · 1904
- McCord v. Thompson-Starrett Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Peekskill Theatre, Inc. v. Advance Theatrical Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
- Swarts v. Board of Education of the City School DistrictNew York Supreme Court · 1964
- Langley v. FurmanNew York Supreme Court · 1928