Legal Opinion
Swarts v. Board of Education of the City School District
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 24, 1964PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDomenick L. Gabrielli, J.
The plaintiffs have brought suit for a permanent injunction asking that certain actions and proceedings of the Board of Education be restrained and enjoined. In addition, the plaintiffs seek a declaration that a local law adopted by the defendant City of Rochester be declared illegal, invalid and unconstitutional.
This present proceeding is an application for a preliminary injunction against the Board of Education to restrain this body from refusing to enroll and register certain students pending thi ' " "n the main action.
Prior to 1992, students districts in Towns oof jDngnton auu ureece, as…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- International Railway Co. v. BaroneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
- Crummey v. MurrayNew York Supreme Court · 1927
- Tonawanda Board & Paper Co. v. City of TonawandaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
- J. Radley Metzger Co. v. FayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
- Belmont Quadrangle Drilling Corp. v. GalekNew York Supreme Court · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Gambar Enterprises, Inc. v. Kelly Services, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Tucker v. ToiaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Moody v. FilipowskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith v. American Italian Anti-Defamation League, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1967
- People v. Wickersham Women's Medical CenterNew York Supreme Court · 1972