Legal Opinion

Peekskill Theatre, Inc. v. Advance Theatrical Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 6, 1923PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Smith, J„:

The injunction asked for seeks to enjoin the defendants and all persons acting in concert with them or under their direction during the pendency of the action, from in any way urging, advising, requesting, inducing or coercing, or attempting so to do, distributors of motion pictures not to deal with plaintiff, or to cease dealing with the plaintiff, or to bring about the breaking of contracts between producers and distributors of motion pictures and the plaintiff, and generally from the doing of all acts complained of in the complaint herein, and for such further relief as may seem…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. American Steel Foundries v. Tri-City Central Trades CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. United States v. American Linseed Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Auburn Draying Co. v. . WardellNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  4. People v. . SheldonNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  5. State v. StewartSupreme Court of Vermont · 1887

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Alexander's Department Stores, Inc. v. Ohrbach's Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943
  2. Leader Theatre Corp. v. Randforce Amusement Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Cable Vision, Inc. v. KUTV, INC.District Court, D. Idaho · 1962
  4. Brandenburg v. Metropolitan Package Store Ass'nNew York Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Andersson v. Franklin Society Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nNew York Supreme Court · 1963

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API