Legal Opinion

Moore v. Motor Vehicles Division

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 9, 1991No. 08 890712 10045; CA A65351PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.

Petitioner seeks judicial review of a Motor Vehicles Division (MVD) order that revoked his driving privileges when it affirmed MVD’s previous determination that he is a habitual traffic offender. ORS 809.640; ORS 809.600(1). He challenges MVD’s use of a DUII conviction and a DWS conviction as underlying offenses in its determination. We affirm.

Petitioner was convicted of DUII in September, 1984, DWS in December, 1987, and another DUII in April, 1989. MVD determined that it was required to revoke his driving privileges, because he was a habitual traffic offender under ORS 809.600. It sent him…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pooler v. Motor Vehicles DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Farah v. Motor Vehicles DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API