Legal Opinion · Dissent

Moore v. Motor Vehicles Division

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 9, 1991No. 08 890712 10045; CA A65351Published

1DissentButtler, P. J.

The majority makes too much of the amendment to ORS 809.640 after our decision in State v. Jackson, 34 Or App 587, 579 P2d 299 (1978), in which we held that the defendant could not collaterally attack the validity of his alleged underlying convictions in the habitual traffic offender hearing. That decision would be controlling here, even without the amendment defining the scope of the hearing, but for Pooler v. MVD, 306 Or 47, 755 P2d 701 (1988).

The issue in Pooler was whether MVD, in an administrative (not criminal) proceeding to suspend Pooler’s driver’s license for failing a breath test,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pooler v. Motor Vehicles DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State v. GrenvikOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  3. State v. HardtCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  4. State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  5. Matteson v. State Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API