Legal Opinion

Holmes Electric Protective Co. v. Metropolitan Burglar Alarm Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Decided December 31, 1887PublishedCited by 9 opinions

In Equity. Action for infringement of patent.

1Opinion of the CourtCoxe, J.

The defendant is charged with infringing letters patent No. 120,874, granted November 14, .1871, to Edwin Holmes and Henry C. Roome, for an improvement in electric linings for safes. The alleged invention consists in placing the electrical apparatus on the outside instead of on the inside of the safe. The claims are as follows:

“(1) A safe or vault provided with an electric outer lining surrounding or covering it wholly or in part, and insulated therefrom, and protected, substantially as herein shown and specified.

'*(2) The exterior inclosure, B, made of the parts 6 and e, substantially as…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Atlantic Works v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Brown v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  3. Mahn v. HarwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. Pennsylvania Railroad v. Locomotive Engine Safety Truck Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
  5. James v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1882

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Thomson-Houston Electric Co. v. Winchester Ave. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut · 1895
  2. Ingersoll v. Delaware & Hudson Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
  3. Independent Electric Co. v. Jeffrey Manuf'g Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio · 1896
  4. Jones v. CyphersU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western New York · 1902
  5. Ludlum Steel Co. v. TerryDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API