Legal Opinion
Linear Technology Corp. v. Impala Linear Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided August 17, 2004No. Nos. 02-1569, 02-1576PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
A combined petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc was filed by Maxim Integrated Products, Inc. (“Maxim”) and a response thereto was invited by the court and filed by Linear Technology Corporation (“Linear”). An amicus curiae brief was filed by Intel Corporation. Thereafter, these filings were referred to the merits panel that heard the appeal.
Upon consideration thereof,
IT IS ORDERED THAT:(1)The Petition for Panel Rehearing is granted for the limited purpose of correcting this court’s reporting of a portion of the district court’s decision.(2) The previous opinion of the court…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Sri International v. Matsushita Electric Corporation of America and Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Teleflex, Inc. v. Ficosa North America Corp., Fico Cables, S.A., and Ficosa North America S.A. De C.V.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Ccs Fitness, Inc. v. Brunswick Corporation and Its Division Life FitnessCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Clearmeadow Investments, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Douglas Dynamics, LLC v. Buyers Products Co.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2010
- Howmedica Osteonics Corp. v. Tranquil Prospects, Ltd.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2007
- NUANCE COMMUNICATIONS INC. v. Tellme Networks Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2010
- Ultratec, Inc. v. Sorenson Communications, Inc.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2014
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.