Bochar v. J. B. Martin Motors, Inc.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Musmanno,
The appellants in this case appeal from judgment on a verdict which they contend is excessive. The jury’s verdict was $15,464.20, which the lower court reduced to $12,000. We begin, therefore, with the accepted rule that — “It is the duty of the lower court to control the amount of the verdict; it is in possession of all the facts as well as the atmosphere of the case, which will enable it to do more even-handed justice between the parties than can an appellate court.” (King v. Equitable Gas Co., 307 Pa. 287.) We can only disturb the lower court’s adjudication…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- King v. Equitable Gas Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Yeager v. Anthracite Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
3Cited by66 opinions
- Kiser v. SchulteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Ruzzi v. Butler Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Stark v. Lehigh Foundries, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Davis v. MullenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Donald Feeley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1964
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.