Legal Opinion

Clark v. Essex Wire Corp.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 9, 1948No. Appeal, 219PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Maxey,

This was an action for an accounting. For a period beginning in 1934 plaintiff was a salesman representative of the Essex Wire Corporation in the eastern district, including New York, Pennsylvania and other states. On October 1, 1941, the parties agreed that, effective November 1, 1941, plaintiff’s compensation would be changed from a commission basis to a fixed salary. Plaintiff alleges that though he agreed to the change, the defendant was obligated to pay him the commissions due on orders placed with the company by him prior to the date of the change, but…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ryman's CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  2. Dannals v. Sylvania TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  3. Carothers v. Pittsburg Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
  4. Bullock v. Chester & Darby Telford Road Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  5. Kelly v. Scranton Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Botta v. BrunnerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
  2. Menarde v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  3. Commonwealth v. StanleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Narciso v. Mauch Chunk TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  5. Balla v. SladekSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API