Legal Opinion

Maldonado v. Claud's Inc.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1956No. Docket 55, 56; Calendar 46,978, 46,979PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarr, J.

The plaintiff ' Artemio Maldonado brought action in circuit court to recover damages from defendant, basing.his cause of action on the provisions of the liquor control act * of the State. Said plaintiff alleged in his declaration that on or about the 25th of January, 1954, the defendant unlawfully sold beer to a minor, Mario Campos, that as a result of said sale Campos, his brother David and one Rafael Pena became intoxicated, that they engaged in an altercation with plaintiff, that David stabbed and cut plaintiff with a knife, and that Pena also stabbed him in the back, inflicting serious…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Wyatt v. ChosayMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Alley v. KlotzMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Juckniess v. SupingerMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Fontana v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1936
  5. McDaniel v. CrapoMichigan Supreme Court · 1950

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Guitar v. BieniekMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Ross Ex Rel. Kanta v. ScottNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Fladeland v. MayerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Shandor v. LischerMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Grinstead v. AnscerMichigan Supreme Court · 1958

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API