Legal Opinion

Grinstead v. Anscer

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 9, 1958No. Docket 22, Calendar 47,257PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.

Plaintiff (wife) obtained a jury verdict of $5,084 sustaining her claim that her husband’s death was caused by defendant’s violation of the Michigan liquor act_ (CLS 1956, §436.22 [Slat Arm 1957 Rev § 18.993]) prohibiting the furnishing or sale of liquor to an intoxicated person. * The trial court, upon defendant’s motion, entered judgment for defendant non obstante veredicto.

April 18, 1956, plaintiff’s deceased husband, a sailor (in uniform), met John Carroll, a marine (in uniform), and Garrette DeBack, a police officer (in plain clothes), ait a Grand Rapids bar, which was known as Vinney’s…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cebulak v. LewisMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Cuttle v. Concordia Mut. Fire Ins. Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Maldonado v. Claud's Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Baessler v. FosterMichigan Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Rizzo v. KretschmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. Western Casualty & Surety Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1960
  3. Duncan v. BeresMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  4. Mason v. LovinsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  5. Sprader v. MuellerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API