Legal Opinion
Johansson v. Central Garden & Pet Co.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided May 26, 2011No. Civ. No. 10-6372PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WILLIAM J. MARTINI, District Judge:
This matter comes before the Court on Defendants Central Garden & Pet Company (“Central Pet”) and Farnam Companies, Inc. (“Farnam”) motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). There was no oral argument. Fed.R.Civ.P. 78. For the reasons stated below, Defendants’ motion to dismiss is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs’ Complaint (“Complaint”), originally filed in the Northern District of California and transferred to this District on December 12, 2010, brings a putative class…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. White Consolidated Industries, Inc., C/o Ct Corporation Systems Registered AgentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Dean Hedges v. United States of America Environmental Moorings InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Argabright v. Rheem Manufacturing Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2016
- Argabright v. Rheem Manufacturing Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2017
- Pierre v. Planet Automotive, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2016
- ALEXANDER v. SECOREDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
- AMATO v. SUBARU OF AMERICA, INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2019
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.