Mott v. Nelson
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtCochran, J.
This action was commenced by the plaintiff in error against the defendant in error to replevy one Hupmo-bile touring car. The possession of the automobile was obtained by the plaintiff in error upon a replevin writ, and upon the trial of the case judigment was awarded against him for tlie value of the car in the sum of $1,300. The parties will he referred to herein as plaintiff and defendant, as they appeared in the trial court.
The plaintiff was engaged in the automobile business in the city of Tulsa and was the agent for the Hupmobile at that place. About six o'clock p. m„ March 23. 1922, R.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People's State Bank v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
- First Nat. Bank of Byars v. Griffin GriffinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Winsted v. ShankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- McIver v. Williamson-Halsell-Frasier Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
3Cited by11 opinions
- Weyerhaeuser Timber Co. v. First National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1934
- Riley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1938
- Barnes v. MorrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Waldock v. State Ex Rel. FinneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- HUDIBURG CHEVROLET, INC. v. PonceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.