Legal Opinion

McIver v. Williamson-Halsell-Frasier Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 20, 1907PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Error from the Probate Court of Oklahoma County; before Wm. P. Harper, Probate Judge. STATEMENT OR RACTS. During the year 1905, Williamson-Halsell-Erasier Company, defendant in error, was engaged in the wholesale grocery business in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma Territory.

Read the full summary

Error from the Probate Court of Oklahoma County; before Wm. P. Harper, Probate Judge. STATEMENT OR RACTS. During the year 1905, Williamson-Halsell-Erasier Company, defendant in error, was engaged in the wholesale grocery business in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma Territory. Sometime between the 1st and 13th of April, 1905, the defendant in error sold and delivered to one Joseph Piekford, a retail groceryman in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, a bill of goods, the terms of which sale were cash. These goods were delivered to Piekford in the afternoon, at his usual place of business in Oklahoma Gity. Invoices…

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the court by

Irwin, J.:

There are many assignments of error urged by counsel for plaintiffs in error for a reversal of this case, but we think it is only necessary to notice three, to-wit: That the court erred in rendering judgment for the defendant in error; (2) that the court erred in giving instructions offered by defendant in error; and (3) that the court erred in not numbering and marking his instructions as required by the statute.

Counsel for plaintiffs in error cite several statutes of Oklahoma, and some decisions of the supreme court of Oklahoma, as well as many decisions…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Morris v. . RexfordNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  2. The Elgee Cotton CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  3. Hussey v. ThorntonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1808
  4. Hammett v. . LinnemanNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  5. Globe Milling Co. v. Minneapolis Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1890

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Carroll v. Cash MillsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
  2. People's State Bank v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  3. Weyerhaeuser Timber Co. v. First National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Anderson v. Oklahoma Moline Plow Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1917
  5. Morris v. AllenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API